In my opinion, it goes too far. Having bars exclusively for smokers was fairly acceptable, but civil liberties shouldnt be taken away. Who in the world goes into a smoker bar anyways to complain that people are smoking there? And almost always the only employee at the bar is the bar owner or another smoker. So I do not want to hear the bullcrap that employees are being unwillingly exposed to SHS, because if you get a job in a smoking environment, then you have to be willing to tolerate the smoke. Otherwise, look for a different job. A number of bars have already closed due to bad business. Why? Because the people who complain almost never visit bars! In my home state, people would be rioting over this because the smoker rate amongst adults is 53%.
In conclusion, a non-smoker protection law should only protect non-smokers and not disadvantage places where they are barely present or recommendedly shouldnt be present.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/I1eITjzMgDI/viewtopic.php
kenny powers kenny powers carl hagelin triple play james neal virginia tech emancipation proclamation
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.